![]() |
|||
Insurance: The Stable Edge Of ChangeThe only thing that is permanent in this world is change. Since we are living in an ever-changing society, one must be capable to cope and live with what the world has to offer. No one could ever predict what's happening next so one must be self-reliant by preparing for the worst possible consequences the world has to offer. To be assured against these unpredictable phenomena, insurance policies are sold. There are a lot of insurance policies available in the market nowadays. Such policies are classified to conform to certain specifications and coverage in the insurance policy. But what of the local business? What policy can they get to protect themselves from any loss resulting from robbery? The most common form is the comprehensive money, securities, and payroll policy. The policy covers loss of money not only because of robbery but also such perils as fire, earthquake, typhoon and flood. Money is covered inside and outside the premises of the insured. The coverage outside premises covers holdup, accidents to the carrying vehicle or to the employee. A location that can refer you to some of these policy providers can be found at www.rentersinsurancehelp.com. A limit of liability is set for money inside the insured's premises. This amount covers cash collections and the petty cash fund. The limit is set at the maximum level of cash. Usually this is the amount kept after banking hours and over the weekend. The peak season should also be taken into account in determining this limit. A separate limit of liability is set for cash outside the premises. This refers to cash on the way to the bank to be deposited or on the way to the premises after having been withdrawn from the bank. Cash in the hands of field salesmen and collectors can also be covered. The third limit of liability is set for the payroll. The coverage starts as soon as an employee, say the cashier, gets hold of the cash at the bank, continues until the cash arrives at the premises and ends at the time the payroll is handed over to the employees. To get rid of the risk of payroll loss, and avoid covering the payroll and paying premium on it, some employers require their employees to withdraw their salaries at the bank. Salaries of executives are automatically credited to their personal bank accounts. The loss of checks is also covered but the insurance company will pay only what it takes to have the checks reissued. So, it is important that as soon as the loss of a check is known, the bank should be advised immediately to stop payment on it. Insurance companies consider the risks covered under the comprehensive money, securities and payroll policy as hazardous. The policy is available only on an accommodation basis; that is, it will be issued only to a client who has a substantial amount of other policies, such as fire, which are considered less hazardous. Related
And here is another random article you might be interested in... How To Make Money From Buy To Let In A Property CrashOver the last few years, most investors who have tried 'buy to let' (buying additional properties in order to rent them out) have profited spectacularly as the property market in most of the world boomed like never before. Historically unprecedented property prices in the USA, UK, Australia and most of Europe have made the concept of becoming a landlord look like an easy route to riches. Of course, there really isn't any 'free lunch', and the situation now, as property markets start to crumble around the globe, isn't looking quite so good for amateur property speculators. Historically, booms of this magnitude are followed rather predictably by equally large crashes, and the smart property landlords evacuated the market over a year ago, selling at the peak to amateurs lured in by the prospect of easy money. These amateurs have typically paid way over the odds for their rental investments, and are in many cases having to subsidize their tenants (i.e. the rent doesn't cover the interest-only payments on the mortgage!). They did this on the promise that future property price appreciation would justify the monthly losses they make by subsidizing the tenant (Ed's note - a pro landlord would NEVER subsidize a tenant in ANY circumstance - yield is everything). So what's a newbie Landlord to do? Paid too much for a property, tenant's rent not even covering the interest on the mortgage and property prices likely to slip a dismal 30% or so over the next 5 years... is it harakiri time? No! There IS a way out, a way so obvious you have probably overlooked it. Sell the property. Simple, huh? In theory yes, but not in practice. Right now, NOTHING is selling. Solution? DROP THE PRICE. You may have to take a 15% or 20% loss on the property now in order to get rid of it. Why on earth would you do this, I hear you ask, after all, aren't you in it for the long term? of course you are. But you must also treat it as a business, so let's look at the business case for the justification. The property market has begun the downswing. Like an ocean going tanker, the market is slow to change direction, but when it does, it's going the opposite way, and for some time. The market ALWAYS punishes 'irrational exuberance' - that's almost a definition of a market. It could be anywhere between 3 and 5 years before this downswing bottoms out, and over that time, a 30% correction is probably the 'best-case' fall one can expect (this would take prices back to the long term mean. In reality they may even undershoot and fall further). After that, it may be another 3 to 5 years before prices once more claw their way back up to the highs of 2004. Now let's be optimistic, let's hope it takes only 3 years down, and 3 years back up. Over that 6 years, you will be subsidizing your tenant each and every month, will be responsible for repairs, taxes, finding new occupiers, and all the hassle that a person would normally expect to get paid for. And you will be doing it for nothing. Nada. Zilch. If you are subsidizing your tenant to the tune of 20% or so (a common figure at present according to industry figures) this means you will effectively have lost about 9% of your investment anyway as the 6 years unfold in all their predictability. Add on the lost opportunity cost of using your money more effective over the 6 years, and you can realistically double that figure BEORE you look at all the hassle and heartache of being a landlord. In other words, pretty much the same cost to you as selling now at what looks like a bad loss. The alternative? You are free to get on with life, and try to find some other way to make money. Additionally, if you manage to sell now, even at a 20% loss, it will probably fall at least another 10%. This means that you can buy again in 3 years time at the lowest point of the crash, and recover your losses in the 3 years that would follow, making a healthy 10% or so whereas as things stand you will only be clawing back to break-even by 2011. And the icing? Buying at the low in 3 years time means a smaller mortgage, which means lower interest payments, which means a respectable yield!. The calculations are quite complicated, but put simply, taking your medicine now in the form a of a 20% hit could mean that in 6 years time you are up perhaps 40%. The choice of course, is yours. And even if you decide to hang on for grim life, there is always a chance that you might make it out the other side with a small profit some time in the next 10 years or so. Best of luck, Landlords! Related
|
